Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 13:39

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s Behind PayPal’s Will Ferrell Ads? - WSJ
Russia can stop this any time.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
iOS 26 Could Bring Sleep Detection, Camera Controls, and New Gestures to AirPods - MacRumors
Thank you.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
HIV Drugs Linked to Lower Alzheimer’s Risk - Neuroscience News
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Alan Turing's iconic paper on a 'universal computing machine' goes up for auction - Live Science
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
How do I cancel WFG Life insurance?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ceres: The asteroid belt’s forgotten ocean world - Big Think